It is very interesting how it seems Mr. Conley has his gang of whatever's going after Mr. Thornton again (still)? It is becoming a bit like a programmed plan of character assassination? If it is that big an issue, Mr. Conley and/ or Mr. Elam should do the Ordinance to eliminate funding and thusly do away with his job? It used to be said that a snake would rattle or even hiss a lot before striking? Now it seems we just have the Snakes?
It is interesting to track the people driving all over Vienna taking pictures and posting comments that are while somewhat interesting, but mostly just that- pictures. They might want to add some "color" to go with what is going on? Unless what is going on is NOT to be seen until??????
I thought that Mr. Rapp was with his cohorts sneaky, some of these people could give him lessons? Does anyone of these current poor members of Council or the Wannabee's campaign group really give a crap about Vienna as a whole? Doesn't seem like it?
People allege they have this report and that report but do nothing with the information? Like I have noted before, the first hint of money or court and they run for the exits. To have information and NOT get it out in the Public or too not act to get a positive result might have worked gossiping over the back fence before. Those days are gone and who knows but that the City is going to resubmit their Brownfield Grant for the new $500,000., instead of settling for a meager $200,000? The crew should have been brought up on charges the last three times for the false information that was alleged in the submissions?
Has been almost three months since the last Court Hearing on the latest Lawsuit in play on the Health Insurance process for the City. Mr. Rapp and his cast of thousands of Attorneys tried to get the desired dismissal, but somehow tripped up and
1. Stated would get copies of the 700 documents provided to me to the than sitting Judge.
2. Agreed to put all the mish mash of documents from both the City and Schwendeman Agency into some sort of order. NOTE: Where are the Highmark Documents? They had about 30 days to get the papers in order and than to what was my Attorney. By the time they got them to him and once I got the Order from the Judge plus the Court Transcript, I had fired him. Than I had 30 days to review and reconcile whatever they said I had in the first pile of about 700 documents with what was in their second pile of 700 documents.
As I noted before, the piles don't match. And it is very clear that the FOIA Law that states I am entitled to review and choose what documents I wish to have has been also written out of the Law by the Defense/ Court. They just dumped on me again although this time in several Annexes and every or almost every page numbered. I have documents they don't seem to have and I can show where they have documents I have not been allowed to review/ choose. Plus of course only the Good Lord knows what from Highmark/ Schwendeman/ the City?
3. As I suspected that when I was advised to file a Motion of Disqualification to the Judge and he did nothing with it for several weeks that he was running out the clock? Would suddenly get the Motion to Dismiss from the Defense; state never saw the Motion to Disqualify and once dismissed, aw shucks, guess you lose again Mr. Wilson.
4. Got some more advice that since the Judge had done nothing with the Disqualification Motion for some weeks to submit, a Writ of Mandamus to the WVSC Chief Justice via that level of Clerk similar to the Wood County Circuit Court Clerk here. This would in theory have the Chief Justice either disqualify or force the local Judge to disqualify himself if he could not explain why he could say he would be impartial, unbiased and not prejudiced in the case.
But my comments to the WVSC Chief Justice in my opinion (biased), showed the bias, partiality and prejudice that caused me to pursue removal of the Judge three (3) times. And what I allege was hanky panky in the presentation of my side of the case by the Attorney at that time? Simply put, there was NO presentation. Just the stretch it out for about 60 more days. So far as I have noted, as I post this, it has not worked as the City wants.
Can I still lose this case, absolutely, it depends on what the WVSC Justice does with my ignored Motions for Recusal (2), for Disqualification (1), and the Writ of Mandamus (1)?
So as I have said several times and again above, if one wants to try and change the corruption going on in Vienna, one had best be prepared to play hardball. And as noted before, I have stood up, stepped out and put MY money where my mouth is to try and help the City as a whole.
As I post this, the City has been alleged to be rewriting the submissions for the three Brownfield Grants submitted and have been writing some interesting documents to hide what they have been doing for decades? Time will as in most things out the Truth sooner or later?
Mr. Skogstand has several times complained on the City having to defend itself and the cost. I will again suggest he take a good look to his left and the Truth will show itself.
The only positive thing that seems to have happened for others is that when THEY put in a FOIA, it is answered within the time frame and per the City Ordinance that I have taken to Court three prior times. I still wait for longer periods than in the Ordinance and my answers are still more crap than substance, but if it is working for the rest of the folks, I am winning. Albeit little by little, the City is I think scared of someone else suing it.
Will as usual comment on Thursday night Council Meeting later. 'nuff said'.